Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv05680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. FDRS, LLC et al
as 2:2014at00287
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
FDRS, LLC and Progressive Housing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. FDRS, LLC, et al.
as 2:2014cv00624
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
FDRS, LLC and Progressive Housing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00214
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chyba v. Progressive Management Systems
as 3:2012cv01723
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chyba
Defendant:
Progressive Management Systems
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Edward Trzaska v. IGT, et al
as 11-16764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SETH TRZASKA
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, ANCHOR COIN, INC. and SPIN FOR CASH WIDE AREA PROGRESSIVE
Robert Holland v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 11-15133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. HOLLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation, PROGRESSIVE FINANCIAL and others
Trzaska v. International Game Technology et al
as 2:2010cv02268
Defendant:
Anchor Coin Inc., International Game Technology and Spin For Cash Wide Area Progressive
Plaintiff:
Edward Seth Trzaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2010cv01768
Plaintiff:
Robert W Holland
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Arizona, State of , Progressive Financial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
