Cases 41 - 50 of 218
Moneeb et al v. City of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2015cv01987
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Moneeb , Muhammad Ikram and Hazakat Ikram
Defendant:
City of Santa Clara, Michael Sellers, Ray Carreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susan Rush v. Robert Fujita et al
as 2:2015cv01304
Defendant:
City of Santa Monica, Does, Santa Monica Police Robert Fujita and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Rush
Maleta Atuatasi v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv00038
Defendant:
Any and All Unknown Municipal and Individual Defendants, Officer B Burgeois, Detective A Canada and others
Plaintiff:
Maleta Atuatasi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorge Rubio v. Rush Card, et al
as 14-16795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE L. RUBIO
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSH CARD and THE BANCORP BANK
Castaneda-Flores et al v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2014cv01960
Plaintiff:
Octavio Castaneda-Flores and Brenda Santana
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Arizona, State of , Sally Cuellar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sorce v. Rush et al
as 3:2014cv02056
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sorce
Defendant:
Litia Rush and Hapenny Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant - Appellee:
CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant / Appellee:
CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Chris Edwards et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv01705
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Shelby Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Edwards, Chris Edwards, Helen Fullilove and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
