Cases 61 - 70 of 1,095
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv02177
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tyisha Mitchell v. Daniel J. Kinney et al
as 2:2023cv08702
Defendant:
Kel Mitchell, Daniel J. Kinney, Judge Kerry R. Bensinger and others
Plaintiff:
Tyisha Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Cohen et al
as 2:2023cv02099
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew Jones, II and Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Bruce Cohen, Suzanne Cohen, Korbin Steiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala D Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scott v. Harris
as 2:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gene Scott, II v. Universal Music Group, et al
as 23-16166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENE EDWARD SCOTT II
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, UMG and UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Warner Brothers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. New Orleans II, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07357
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, James Lee and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
NEW ORLEANS II, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
