Cases 61 - 70 of 148
Tarabochia v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2018cv05056
Plaintiff:
Samuel Tarabochia
Defendant:
Thurston County , Peter Feliciano , Christopher Marx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas Arledge v. Ada County, et al
as 17-35113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS RAY ARLEDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
ADA COUNTY, ADA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ADA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
MacFarlane et al v. State of Oregon Department of Human Services, (DHS) et al
as 3:2017cv00032
Defendant:
Christina Bordeau, John/Jane Doe, Jodi Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Donald D. MacFarlane, Minor Child(A) and Minor Child(B)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boshears et al vs. Kitsap County et al
as 3:2016cv06012
Plaintiff:
William Boshears and Jordan Boshears
Defendant:
Kitsap County , Lynne Williams, Sarah Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv06007
Plaintiff:
Carlos E Castillo
Defendant:
Marty Brown , Shaunta Hyde , Jay Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamell et al v. Idaho County et al
as 3:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Rachelle J Hamell and Raymond R Hamell
Defendant:
Idaho County , Kathy Ackerman , Mark Frei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 et al
as 4:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael Zeyen
Defendant:
Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25, Mary M. Vagner, John/Jane Does I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv05112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.