Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Henrickson v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 4:2010cv00301
Plaintiff:
John Paul Henrickson
Defendant:
United States Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson et al v. National Security Agency et al
as 2:2009cv01789
Plaintiff:
Roger Clarence Thompson and G.R.T.
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LeRoy v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2009cv02080
Plaintiff:
Nancy LeRoy
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Hill Sanders, III v. CIA
as 09-55077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HILL SANDERS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Farnan v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 3:2008cv00463
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Farnan
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, United States of America and Michael A. Hayden
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Glen Broemer v. CIA, et al
as 08-56265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLEN BROEMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ISAUM DAFESH, a/k/a Doe 1, DAS SECURITY, a/k/a Doe 2 and others
Ticktin v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2008cv00998
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ticktin
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Carol Shulman v. CIA
as 08-55495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL LEE SHULMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Taha v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 3:2007cv01160
Plaintiff:
Samir Taha
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency and Roberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mercier v. Federal Bureau Of Investigation et al
as 2:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
George Mercier
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Investigation, United States Attorney General and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
