Cases 71 - 80 of 104
Percy Anderson, Sr. v. Health & Human Services Agency, et al
as 13-56320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY ANDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, San Diego, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, TONYA SLOAN and others
Percy Anderson, Sr. v. County of San Diego, et al
as 13-56317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY ANDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, SHELLY PAULE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Melania Granados v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv01910
Defendant:
Chief Charles Beck, Chief Charles Beck, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Melania Granados
Anderson v. San Diego Health & Human Service Agency et al
as 3:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Percy Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
San Diego Health & Human Service Agency , San Diego, County of , Tonya Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Peter Harrell v. Ray George, et al
as 12-17370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY GEORGE, CLAY SLOAN, BEVERLY COX and others
Gudgel v. Yarnell et al
as 2:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
Gerald Gudgel
Defendant:
D M Yarnell , Clayton A Hill , Karl F Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hess v. Stumpf et al
as 3:2012cv03041
Plaintiff:
David Monroe Hess
Defendant:
John G Stumpf, Timothy J. Sloan, James M. Strother and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
