Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Constant et al
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Constant, Thomas Bruce, Michael C. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J. Medina et al v. Victor Garcia et al
as 2:2023cv06393
Plaintiff:
J. MEDINA and O. MEDINA
Petitioner:
Jennifer Garcia
Defendant:
VICTOR GARCIA, SCOTT JOSEPH CARPENTER, JILL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Axley v. Moskovko et al
as 2:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Amanda Beth-Lynn Axley
Defendant:
Seva Moskovko, Terri Schrader and Bobby Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Haley Olsen v. County of Grant, et al
as 23-35365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HALEY OLSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF GRANT, a government entity, GLENN PALMER and JIM CARPENTER
Defendant:
ABIGAIL MOBLEY
Allen et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
Trent Allen, Shagoofa Khan, Adam Carpenter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tutankhaman v. Carpenter et al
as 2:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant:
Jaden Carpenter, Jaeden Smith and Jaden Smith
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
