Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55625
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01228
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01651
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01562
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane D.M. Doe v. County of Los Angeles, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03218
Plaintiff: JANE D.M. DOE, a minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem Ivette Rodriguez and Jane D.M. Doe
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15934
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15611
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dana Maddox, et al v. City of Sandpoint, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35875
Plaintiff - Appellee: DANA MADDOX, on behalf of D.M. and D.M., minor children and heirs of Jeanetta Riley, deceased, D.M., D.M. and others
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF SANDPOINT, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, CITY OF SANDPOINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, a department of the City of Sandpoint, SKYLAR CARL ZIEGLER, in his individual and official capacity and others
Murphy et al v. South Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2017cv00367
Plaintiff: Garrett Murphy , Sarah Murphy and D.M.
Defendant: South Tucson, City of , Thomas Schenek and Jeff Inorio
Counter_claimant: Jeff Inorio , South Tucson, City of and Thomas Schenek
Counter_defendant: D.M. , Garrett Murphy and Sarah Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chanda Smith v. LAUSD, et al
as 17-55880
Plaintiff: CHANDA SMITH, through her guardian ad litem Eliza Thompson, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Intervenor - Appellant: APRIL MUNOZ, Guardian ad litem for D.M., JULIA FLORES, Guardian ad litem for A.F., CHERYL AYAPANA, Guardian ad Litem for J. A. and others
Defendant - Appellee: LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public entity and ROY ROMER, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the LA Unified School District

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?