Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff: Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant: HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sarah Isbell v. OKDHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16629
Plaintiff - Appellant: SARAH ISBELL
Defendant - Appellee: OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, JIM HUTCHINSON, Director Of Oklahoma Department of Human Services, in his official and individual capacities and others
Isbell v. State of Oklahoma, Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00269
Plaintiff: Sarah Isbell
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, Department of Human Services, State of California, Department of Child Support Services, Jim Hutchinson, Director Of Oklahoma Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme Court, et al
as 08-17570
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE LLOYD MOTHERSHED, I, pro se
Defendant - Appellee: JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF ARIZONA, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff: The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barnes-Wallace, etal, et al v. Boy Scouts of Am, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-55732
Plaintiff - Appellee: MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE and MAXWELL BREEN
Defendant: CITY OF SAN DIEGO
Defendant - Appellant: BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - DESERT PACIFIC COUNCIL
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN LEGION POST NUMBER 3, STATE TEXAS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?