Cases 11 - 20 of 214
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
Jess Brasuell, III v. San Luis Obispo County Jail, et al
as 22-55316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESS D. BRASUELL III
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY JAIL, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, Custody Division Deputies and Staff, official capacity and others
Jamelle Edward Armstrong v. Giselle Matteson
as 2:2022cv01019
Petitioner:
Jamelle Edward Armstrong
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaheed-Muhammad, #148986 v. Centurion Arizona et al
as 2:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad
Defendant:
Centurion Arizona, Unknown Stickley, Unknown Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Armstrong v. Plumas County of California
as 2:2021cv01881
Plaintiff:
Eric Anthony Armstrong
Defendant:
Plumas County of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Getzen v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00384
Plaintiff:
David Getzen
Defendant:
David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and Ben Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Cervantes v. Daniel Moisa et al
as 2:2021cv06268
Plaintiff:
Raul Cervantes
Defendant:
Daniel Moisa, Chief Deputy Warden R. C. Johnson, Warden (L.A.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Moisa et al
as 1:2021cv05834
Plaintiff:
Raul Cervantes
Defendant:
Daniel Moisa, R. C. Johnson, Warden, LAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Stevenson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Buckeye Police Department, John Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Dr. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv03552
Respondent:
Dr. Lee, L. Shover, M. Armstrong and others
Petitioner:
Albert Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
