Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Jason Mahe v. Joe Barlett, et al
as 21-17141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON A. MAHE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BARLETT, DAMON BELL, DIANNA BELL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, NORTHERN NEVADA CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Walker v. Keen et al
as 3:2021cv08799
Plaintiff:
Le'Ondre Walker
Defendant:
Jhon Keen, District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, David Haubert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LePrinceton Dewon Burks v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv06038
Plaintiff:
LePrinceton Dewon Burks
Defendant:
Los Angeles Police Department, Bradley Schumacher, Martin Pinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moret v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Defendant:
Channing Bennett, State of Oregon, James Egan and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holman v. San Francisco Superior Court et al
as 4:2020cv03515
Plaintiff:
Roylund Holman
Defendant:
Bonnie Chan, Greg Goldman, San Francisco Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Paramo et al
as 3:2020cv00843
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, M. Garikaparthi, E. Benyard and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Armstead v. Haynes et al
as 3:2020cv05327
Defendant:
Kendra Wakefield, Annice Mizin, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell M Armstead, Jr, Casey Woodson, Justin T Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Scott v. Chan et al
as 1:2019cv01079
Defendant:
J. Chan and California Department of Correcitons
Plaintiff:
Rickey Leon Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. USA
as 3:2018cv02082
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Channing Lacey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
