Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Ridgeley v. Cole et al
as 2:2020cv01379
Defendant:
Unknown Cole, Unknown Diamond, Unknown Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Ridgeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dominic Vargas and Diamond Vargas
Defendant:
Statewide Medical Authorization Review Team, C. Pierini, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Mangum et al
as 2:2019cv05322
Defendant:
J Douglas Mangum and Jesus Acosta
Plaintiff:
Kamari Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Zielinski
as 2:2019cv05239
Defendant:
Mary Zielinski
Plaintiff:
Kamari Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Missouri, State of et al
as 2:2018cv04631
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Mike Diamond, Cape Giraudua County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Simm Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01727
Defendant:
John Doe I, Captian Boston, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 18-56201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARC DIAMOND, Los Angeles Police Department Detective, individual and official capacities
William Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 2:2018cv05883
Defendant:
Marc Diamond
Plaintiff:
William Washington and William Nathaniel Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 17-56460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
MARC DIAMOND, Los Angeles Police Department Detective, individual and official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
