Cases 11 - 20 of 361
Beese v. Valley
as 1:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Derek Duane Beese
Respondent:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duane L. Loyd v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00381
Petitioner:
Duane L. Loyd
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askari #284072 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
JaJa'Amiri M Askari
Defendant:
David Shinn, Lori Stickley, Wendy Eccles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duane Magee v. John Merchant
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Duane M. Magee
Defendant:
John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Hickman v. People of the State of California
as 23-15117
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN DUANE HICKMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Loyd v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Duane L. Loyd
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
Allen v. Mineral County et al
as 9:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Allen
Defendant:
Mineral County, Wayne Cashman, Mike Toth and others
Cross Defendant:
Mineral County Administrators and Dawn Terrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Mineral County et al
as 9:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Joseph Todd Morgan
Defendant:
Mineral County, Mineral County Administrators, Wayne Cashman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damschen v. Mineral County et al
as 9:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Damschen
Defendant:
Mineral County, Mineral County Administrators, Wayne Cashman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruthford v. Mineral County et al
as 9:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Gary Ruthford
Defendant:
Mineral County, Mineral County Administrators, Wayne Cashman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
