Cases 11 - 20 of 209
Gill v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gill
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Shipton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wauneka #082558 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Delbert Wauneka
Defendant:
David Shinn, Doug Ducey, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Williams v. Peterson et al
as 2:2021cv02335
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
A. Peterson, M. Camarena, R. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Price v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2021cv02309
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Anne Marie Schubert, Sacramento County, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Price v. Gill et al
as 2:2021cv02295
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Gill, C. Goncalves, R. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Sacramento County et al
as 4:2021cv09469
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Anne Marie Schubert, Sacramento County, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v Howard
as 4:2021cv00247
Petitioner:
Ralph James Buchanan, Jr., Daniel Gill and Vincent DeMarco
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bauer et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2021cv04659
Plaintiff:
Ethan Bauer, Richard Gill-Kellum and Clayborne Dennis
Defendant:
CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, Clarence Cryer, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Judge Peter C. Dedded, Judge Ronda Trupp, Judge David Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Smart v. Georgry et al
as 1:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
Aaron Smart
Defendant:
Conmancho, Georgry and Gills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
