Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Horton v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Kemp Horton
Defendant:
David Shinn and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stem #161904 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Brandon C Stem
Defendant:
David Shinn, Stacy Crabtree, Kristine Harkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bradford v. Brewer et al
as 2:2021cv01413
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
K. Brewer, C. McElroy, L. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton II v. Gittere et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Allen Horton II
Defendant:
T. Hanf, William Gittere, Stolks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Lee Hill v. Deputy District Attorney John Doe et al
as 2:2020cv08779
Defendant:
Michele A. Douglass, Deputy District Attorney Jane Doe, Deputy District Attorney John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Uttecht
as 3:2020cv05138
Plaintiff:
William Horton, Jr,.
Respondent:
Jeffrey A Uttecht
Petitioner:
William Horton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Geoffrey Townsend, Louis Avila, Pima County Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Horton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton II v. Nash et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Allen Horton II
Defendant:
Warden Brian Williams, Dr Rios, Height and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. ASH et al
as 2:2019cv07857
Defendant:
Dewayn, Danielle Paladino, David Peter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Jerome Phillips Jr. v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2019cv01518
Defendant:
Sergeant Nariso, Brett Johnson, Riverside County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jerome Phillips, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
