Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Smith v. Hentschel et al
as 2:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
Alan Justin Smith
Defendant:
Kristin Hentschel, Mike Stone, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00629
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Janelle Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Cox et al
as 2:2020cv01670
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burton Underwood
Defendant:
Brad Cain, John Doe, Court Clerk Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Norsworthy v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv00813
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Roselle Branch, Robert Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle-Lael B. Norsworthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yallup v. Riddle et al
as 1:2020cv03066
Defendant:
Renee S Townsley and Janelle Riddle
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Yallup, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norsworthy v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv01859
Plaintiff:
Norsworthy and Michelle-Lael B. Norsworthy
Defendant:
Diaz, Ralph Diaz, Roselle Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. County of Pierce et al
as 3:2020cv05207
Defendant:
Jessica A Williams, County of Pierce, Janel French and others
Plaintiff:
Broderick J Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Lepesh v. Amy Pinkley-Wernz, et al
as 20-35052
Defendant / Appellee:
JANELL ROCHESTER, at SRCI, NATE LOWE, OSP, R. GOLDSTON, Inspector and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY V. LEPESH
Defendant:
BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent at O.S.P., MELISSA A. GILBERT, AKA M. Davidson, JEFF PRIMO and others
Monica H. Benavidez v. Janel Espinoza
as 2:2019cv06156
Respondent:
Janel Espinoza
Petitioner:
Monica H. Benavidez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Espinoza et al
as 3:2019cv01036
Respondent:
Janel Espinoza and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Suzanna K. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
