Cases 11 - 20 of 504
(PC) Murphy v. Fleming, et al.
as 1:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Leigh Fleming, Ambrosia Fitzgerald, Attorney Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08484
Plaintiff:
Brendan J Murphy
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Murphy
as 5:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cash McDowell
Defendant:
Trevor Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred Murphy v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55521
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFRED MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Starkgraf v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05487
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Melissa A Hemstreet, Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. Lyons et al
as 3:2023cv05497
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf and Kris
Defendant:
Samantha Lyons, Melissa A Hemstreet, Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Flores
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Monrell Donovan Murphy
Defendant:
D. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Unknown Party
as 3:2023cv08083
Petitioner:
Annette Theadora Murphy
Respondent:
Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. State Judges et al
as 3:2023cv05373
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Richardson
Defendant:
State Judges, Pierce County, Joe Murry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thies v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Thies
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Director Rienkee, Idaho State Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
