Cases 11 - 20 of 296
Nigoa v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
Rosa Nigoa
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arteaga v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Rosa Maria Arteaga
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanford v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv04211
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Defendant:
Lt. B. Perez, J. Coleman, B. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumontinee Sridej v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 23-16021
Petitioner / Appellant:
SUMONTINEE SRIDEJ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, GARY SCHOFIELD and others
Lewis Sibomana v. Luis Rosa, Jr., et al
as 23-15942
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEWIS ABDUL KALIM SIBOMANA
Respondent / Appellee:
LUIS ROSA, Jr., Warden, Warden, NSDC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramos v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Rosa Guadalupe Ramos
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharrod Moten v. Pedro Pulido, et al
as 23-55444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARROD MOTEN
Defendant / Appellee:
PEDRO PULIDO, Correctional Officer, individual capacity, AKA Padro Pulido, MARICRUZ WERNER, Correctional Officer, individual capacity, ROSA IBARRA, Correctional Officer, individual capacity and others
Rosas v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Liliana Rosas
Respondent:
Warden Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosas Catano v. Pierce County Judicial System
as 3:2023cv05332
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santiago Rosas Catano
Defendant:
Pierce County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Rosas v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00616
Petitioner:
Mario Rosas
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
