Cases 11 - 20 of 231,617
Bonneau v. Unknown Hospital Administrator et al
as 6:2024cv00894
Petitioner:
Ryan Bieber Bonneau, Ryan Bautista Bonneau and Ryan Bonneau
Respondent:
Unknown Hospital Administrator, State of Oregon and Does 1-23
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Bennett v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01587
Plaintiff:
Mario Bennett
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murillo v. Covello, et al.
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Mr. Canelo, Stephanie Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gaviola Patron v. Hugh, et al
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
D'Annunzio Roman Gaviola Patron
Defendant:
Lewy Hugh, C. Mares and G. Herara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mackey v. Rudd, et al.
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Terry Mackey
Defendant:
Rudd, K. Ram, Sgt. Mix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Drake v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Earl David Drake
Defendant:
T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Janoiko v. Marchak et al
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Richard Janoiko
Defendant:
Marina Marchak, Steven Galarza and Vahid Nikzad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz-Colin #193913 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Eleazar Cruz-Colin and Adrian Gonzalez Cruz
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bluhm v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08108
Petitioner:
Michael Bluhm
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Garland
as 4:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Demetrius Verardi Ramos
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
