Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Singh v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv01396
Petitioner:
Mukesh Singh
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Neil Clark and Alberto R Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01723
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lin v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01350
Petitioner:
Yan Ri Lin
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Murillo et al v. Gonzales, et al
as 2:2007cv01627
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Murillo
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Uegrete-Cardenas v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01626
Petitioner:
Alfredo Uegrete-Cardenas
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sim v. Gonzales
as 2:2007cv01581
Petitioner:
Sarob Sim
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Seng v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01262
Petitioner:
Em Seng
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ngo v. Gonzales
as 2:2007cv01548
Petitioner:
Thanh Minh Ngo
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barnes v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv01176
Petitioner:
Michael Trent Barnes
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales and Charlie A. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
