Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Graham v. Lappin et al
as 4:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Graham
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Harrell Watts, Craig Apker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2011cv00588
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Fields
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Craig Apker, Dawn Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Christoferson v. J. Thomas, et al
as 11-35721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES CHRISTOFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. E. THOMAS, Warden, FCI Sheridan, DANIEL WOMELDORF, DENNIS BURNS and others
Figueroa-Molineros v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv01229
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Figueroa-Molineros
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Harley G. Lappin , Donna Mellendick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tony Alexander v. Scott Schleder, et al
as 11-16791
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY B. ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT SCHLEDER, Southeast Regional DHO, ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Western Regional Director and HARRELL WATTS, Administration National Inmate Appeals
Tony Alexander v. D. Lorance, et al
as 11-16393
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY B. ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
D. LORANCE, DHO, Western Regional Office, STOKES, SOS, USP Atwater, DAVENPORT, SOS, USP Atwater and others
Mary Johnson v. USDOJ, et al
as 11-15971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, KATHLEEN HAWK-SWAYERD and others
Alexander v. Lorance et al
as 1:2011cv00593
Petitioner:
Tony B. Alexander
Respondent:
D. Lorance , - Stokes , - Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Espinoza v. Watts et al
as 2:2011cv00929
Petitioner:
Devin Espinoza
Respondent:
Harrell Watts and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander v. Fisher, et al.
as 1:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Alexander
Defendant:
Fisher , Luke , D Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
