Cases 21 - 30 of 227
Juan Molina v. W. Montgomery
as 22-55958
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO MOLINA
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
Mapes v. Hart et al
as 2:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Charles Russell Mapes
Defendant:
Unknown Hart, Unknown Cartwright, Unknown Aispuro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mapes v. Hart et al
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Charles Russell Mapes
Defendant:
Unknown Hart, A Moore, Brin Hoffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timlick #075126 v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Richard B Timlick
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Wayne Jordan, Robert Defresne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nam Ba Nguyen v. J. Molina et al
as 8:2022cv01456
Plaintiff:
Nam Ba Nguyen
Defendant:
J. Molina and B Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Ashker v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-16162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, SCOTT KERNAN, GEORGE GIURBINO and others
(PC) Moguel v. Larsson et al
as 2:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Mervyn Moguel
Defendant:
Larsson, Arya, Moau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon McDermott v. Anna Moreno, et al
as 22-15718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON ALLEN MCDERMOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNA MORENO, Property Officer - Lewis Complex, BRIAN EVANS, Co. Account Movement, HIRST, First name unknown; Sergeant - Lewis Complex and others
(PC) Davis v. Portillo et al
as 2:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brandon Davis
Defendant:
M. Portillo, Molina and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Portillo et al
as 1:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brandon Davis
Defendant:
M. Portillo, Molina and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
