Cases 21 - 30 of 320
Benjamin Freeman v. Douglas Ducey, et al
as 22-16090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS DUCEY, DAVID SHINN, Director, ADC, JOE PREFINI, Southern Reginal Operations Director and others
Denard Neal v. USA
as 22-16075
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Neal v. NDOC et al
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Neal
Defendant:
NDOC, Michael Minev, NP C Pritchett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William D. Neal Jr. v. Uvias
as 2:2022cv03865
Plaintiff:
William D. Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Uvias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. USA
as 2:2022cv00884
Petitioner:
Denard Darnell Neal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sirvontre Ingram v. Neal Taniguchi, et al
as 22-15381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIRVONTRE INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
NEAL TANIGUCHI, JONATHAN KARESH, DONALD J. AYOOB and others
Douglas Derello, Jr. v. Lori Stickley, et al
as 22-15379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS WAYNE DERELLO, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI STICKLEY, DW, J MCADOREY, DW, STEVEN SCOTT, ADW and others
Thomas Gandara v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 22-55214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ARTHUR GANDARA
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California, TIMOTHY HOLLANDHURST, Superior Court Judge, Riverside California, EMMA C. SMITH, Superior Court Judge, Riverside, California and others
Murray
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Gregory Neal Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
