Cases 21 - 30 of 383
John Nieto v. Gordon, et al
as 23-15788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MOISES NIETO
Defendant / Appellee:
GORDON, Warden, YORK, DIAZ-NAVARRO and others
Lupercio v. Flier
as 5:2023cv02241
Petitioner:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
Andrew Reed Flier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winfield v. Sigala et al
as 3:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Winfield
Defendant:
Sigala, A. Gonzalez, Pulido and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Talavera v. Ravijot et al
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Talavera
Defendant:
Dr. Gill Ravijot, Dr. Francisco Hernandez, April Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lupercio v. Attorney et al
as 4:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
Attorney and Andrew Flier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lupercio Navarro v. Attorney et al
as 2:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Ramon Lupercio Navarro and Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
Attorney and Andrew Flier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Gates v. Navarro et al
as 1:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Johnny Howard Gates
Defendant:
M. Navarro, F. Barrios and J. Alejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Brown
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen, Laura Eldridge, Dr. D. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. Walker et al
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lugo
Defendant:
Gerald Walker, Boru Nale, Unknown Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
