Cases 21 - 30 of 723
Ramos v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Brian J. Ramos
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Turner v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's, et al.
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff's, W. Weston, Vallejo Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina #268030 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Dominic Alfred Medina
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Girke, Unknown Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos-Munoz #301088 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv02621
Plaintiff:
Christian Joseph Ramos-Munoz
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Ramos v. Lemon
as 1:2023cv01707
Petitioner:
Gavino Cirilo Ramos
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Helidoro S. Gonsales and Helidoro S Gonzales
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, S. Gates, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Washington v. Alex Villanueva et al
as 2:2023cv09836
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Alex Villanueva, Steinert, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Luis Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Armstrong #314416 v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv02401
Plaintiff:
Kpou Armstrong
Defendant:
Alfred Ramos, Fransisco Hernandez and Mia Baldenegro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. McAdorey et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Netzahualcoyotl G Ramos
Respondent:
John McAdorey and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
