Cases 31 - 40 of 3,534
Cody Adam Julian v. Edward J. Borla
as 2:2024cv01422
Petitioner:
Cody Adam Julian
Respondent:
Edward J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2024cv05024
Petitioner:
Dakota Edward Stevens
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julian v. Borla
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Julian Adam Cody and Cody Adam Julian
Defendant:
Edward J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
William Edward Green
Respondent:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Khan v. Stricklin et al
as 5:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, Robin Stricklin, Sean Tumacder and others
Plaintiff:
Khan Muhammad and Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Linton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Torres v. Khaira
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Edward Torres
Defendant:
Jaspreet Singh Khaira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones, Jr. v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Jones, Officer J. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Jackson v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Douglas V Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Jones v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Jones, Officer J. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
