Cases 31 - 40 of 614
Fred Dorton v. D. Samuel
as 2:2022cv06522
Petitioner:
Fred Dorton
Respondent:
D. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Barrett et al
as 2:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
S. Seanah Dixon
Defendant:
Stacy Barrett, Robert Jarrett, Robert Ashcraft and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jonathan Armand Harris
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Leah Lucas, Russell S. Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bousley v. Polley et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bousley
Defendant:
Bonnie Polley, Ramona Logan, Forbus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miranda v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Victor Miranda, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Shinn, Amanda Thrush, Fred Altamirano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael R. Spengler v. Dr. Federick D. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Defendant:
Dr. Frederick D. Williams, Ms. Zuniga, RN. Himaya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dean v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Flowers v. Fred Foulk
as 21-17121
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH J. FLOWERS
Respondent / Appellee:
FRED FOULK, Warden
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Swan v. Sedigh et al
as 3:2021cv01934
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Swan
Defendant:
Dr. Fred Sedigh, Dr Mehta, Richard J Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
