Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Tierney v. Torikawa et al
as 1:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Lois Torikawa, Irene Revilla, Scott Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Tierney v. Okamoto et al
as 1:2011cv00800
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Dr. Okamoto, Scott Harrington, Lois Torikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierney v. Okamoto et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Dr. Okamoto, Scott Harrington, Lois Torikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Burton v. The D.O.C., et al
as 11-35334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN BURTON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE D.O.C., CRYSTAL BENSON, C.C.O., individually and acting under color of law, RENEE COOPER, SPRVR, individually, and acting under color of law and others
Proctor v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2011cv00754
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , William Crane, Virginia Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley D Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourmaian v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2010cv02233
Plaintiff:
Vartkes Bourmaian
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Douglas Gillespie, Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loy
as 3:2010cv05356
Petitioner:
Elay Loy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. IDOC et al
as 1:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Rob L Mitchell
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Johanna Smith, Lois Adrian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nuh Loi v. Larry Scribner, et al
as 09-57066
Petitioner - Appellee:
NUH NHUOC LOI
Respondent - Appellant:
LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden, Warden and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California
Lerajjarean Ra-o-kel-ly v. Michael Johnson
as 09-35712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LERAJJAREAN RA-O-KEL-LY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, THOMAS BEAUCLAIR, BRENT REINKE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
