Cases 31 - 40 of 1,613
(HC) Sanchez v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv02806
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Sanchez
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2023cv06093
Petitioner:
Paul L. Winters
Respondent:
Yesenia Sanchez and California Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez-Diaz v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01725
Petitioner:
Efrain Sanchez-Diaz
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogg v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2023cv06021
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Hogg, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Yesenia L. Sanchez, R. Quinteros and R. Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ismail Mora v. E. Sanchez et al
as 2:2023cv09635
Plaintiff:
Ismail Mora
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, R. Roque, B. Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05617
Plaintiff:
Hilbert Thomas
Defendant:
Oak Smith, S. Sanchez and J. Munger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Rayshivers v. Luiz et al
as 1:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
Tommy Rayshivers
Defendant:
Luiz and Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tresor Maleka Ndandu v. Alvarado et al
as 2:2023cv08882
Petitioner:
Tresor Maleka Ndandu
Respondent:
Alvarado, Almager, A. Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Three Unidentified White Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
Shelly Ann Sanchez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Clint Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gotoy v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Shahied Gotoy
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Jeremy Bean, Omar Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
