Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01854
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mahsill v. Clay et al
as 4:2013cv01000
Petitioner:
Devere Mahsill
Respondent:
B Clay and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 4:2013cv00704
Plaintiff:
Gary D Hill
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and Isaac Fulwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Thomas v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2013cv04200
Petitioner:
Ricky Thomas
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Bracy v. Clay et al
as 4:2013cv00128
Petitioner:
Boyer A Bracy
Respondent:
Becky Clay and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Darrell Parks v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 12-57181
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
ISAAC FULWOOD, Jr., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, PAUL R.A. HOWARD, Examiner, United States Parole Commission, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Victorville-Federal Correctional Complex and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02044
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brigden v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2012cv00716
Petitioner:
Scott David Brigden
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dale Harrison v. R P Guttierrez et al
as 2:2012cv06368
Respondent:
R P Guttierrez and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Dale Harrison
Michael DeVaughn v. USPC
as 12-55329
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
