Cases 41 - 50 of 157
Leroy Wells v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 16-35917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, ANNA M. JOYCE, BENJAMIN N. GUTMAN and others
Vahe Tahmasian et al v. Mark Dag et al
as 2:2016cv08080
Defendant:
Rudy Barranco, Juan D. Castillo, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Vahe Tahmasian
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavness v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2016cv03300
Petitioner:
Michael Cavness
Respondent:
Vicki Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David W. Svete v. Certain FCI Terminal Island Federal Prison Employees et al
as 2:2016cv01928
Defendant:
Ms. Attencio, Bart, Karen Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Svete
Pashia v. Spruell et al
as 4:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Calvin Paul Pashia
Defendant:
Vicky Spruell, Mike Mitchell, Unknown Kealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv00327
Defendant:
Vicki Applegate, Samuel A. Kubernick, Kim Migliaccio and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David W. Svete v. Certain FCI Terminal Island Federal Employees et al
as 2:2016cv00427
Defendant:
Ms. Attencio, Bart, Karen Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Svete
Lemus v. Kings County Sheriff Office/Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01392
Plaintiff:
Alfred H. Lemus, Jr.
Defendant:
Kings County Sheriff Office/Jail, David Robinson, Kim Pedreiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
