Cases 41 - 50 of 112
Anthony D Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv03207
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Anthony D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond Navarro v. Chavez et al
as 2:2019cv01244
Plaintiff:
Raymond Navarro
Defendant:
R. Diaz, D. Johnson and Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sherman et al
as 3:2018cv01542
Petitioner:
Lonnie D. Johnson
Respondent:
Xavier Becerra and Stuart Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez-Torres et al v. Rosales et al
as 2:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramon Martinez-Torres and Araceli Toruga
Defendant:
Richard Lee Rosales, Unknown Rosales, Scott Nikolaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. McCloud et al
as 3:2018cv00085
Defendant:
Shannon S. McCloud, James M. Milburn, Donald K. Carlon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayse et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Bayse , Michael R. Conroy , Matthew J. Heath and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Clark Kelso, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv04473
Petitioner:
Darryl D Johnson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2017cv04068
Plaintiff:
Darryl D Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Unknown Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal Hendrix v. James Cox, et al
as 17-17047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, SHERYL FOSTER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
Cohea v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv05399
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., C. E. Ducart, Dave Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
