Cases 41 - 50 of 1,205
Caraffa v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caraffa v. Thornell
as 2:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Jones v. P. Horn
as 23-55650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY A. JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
P. HORN
Snyder v. Missoula County Detention Facility et al
as 9:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Joanna M. Snyder
Defendant:
Missoula County Detention Facility, Jason Kowalski, Sheryl Ziegler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adams v. Shirley
as 1:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Henry Adams
Defendant:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown Party v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08155
Plaintiff:
Henry Bailey
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08289
Plaintiff:
Roy L Henry
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen v. Billingsly
as 2:2023cv01349
Petitioner:
David Henry Hansen
Respondent:
James Billingsly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Martinez v. San Joaquin County Sheriff
as 2:2023cv01323
Petitioner:
Alfonso Henry Martinez
Respondent:
San Joaquin County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
