Cases 41 - 50 of 347
Sullivan, et al. v. Bannock County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Sullivan, Theodore James Sullivan, Robin Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Bannock County, Kootenai County, Elmore County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Oregon State Penitentiary
as 6:2022cv01219
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Oregon State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luke v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv01181
Petitioner:
Robert Lane Luke
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Gorup et al
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Douglas N Lane
Defendant:
Chelsea Gorup, Viola Hartley and Paula Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan Hidde v. Attorney General for the State of Arizona, et al
as 22-15758
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORDAN LANE HIDDE
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Bowman v. Ankenbrandt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Bowman
Defendant:
Ankenbrandt, Ahlm, Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Whittenberg v. Ayala et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lane Kelly Whittenberg
Defendant:
Jose Tovar Ayala and Philip Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tom v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
Lane Charlie Tom
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. State of Nevada
as 3:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael V Lane
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saenz v. Lane et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Steven A Saenz
Defendant:
Robert Lane, John Chavez, South Tucson, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
