Cases 41 - 50 of 275
Ruffin v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv06044
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dwayne Ruffin
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, Patty Jackson and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter-Shabazz v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv06045
Plaintiff:
Mumit Xh Carter-Shabazz
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, NaphCare, Patty Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman #050101 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02324
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Justin A Newsome, Diana Curd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Crawford #249708 v. Robbles et al
as 2:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
Christopher Crawford
Defendant:
Unknown Robbles, Unknown Rapport and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickens v. NaphCare
as 3:2023cv05934
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Dickens
Defendant:
NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham #152032 v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
Tomas Latham
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated and Grace Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brumfield #257114 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2023cv02052
Plaintiff:
Quaraii Rashad Brumfield
Defendant:
NaphCare and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernal #211638 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Sergio Alfredo Bernal
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Stewart, Unknown Fengie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham #360525 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Carnell Antoin Cunningham
Defendant:
NaphCare, Unknown Vargas and Unknown Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno #166076 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Jorge Herberto Moreno
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, David Shinn, Unknown Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
