Cases 51 - 60 of 1,477
Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Travis Scott, et al
as 22-16793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS SCOTT, NATHANIEL HARRIS, #1495, DAVID SHINN, Director and others
Hagos v. Poly Clinic et al
as 2:2022cv01610
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Poly Clinic, Seattle Police Department, City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Davis v. San Joaquin County
as 2:2022cv02011
Petitioner:
Willis Davis
Respondent:
San Joaquin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. To Whom is Involved
as 3:2022cv01728
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
To Whom is Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Gate Fourth Judicial Dist. Pros. Office
as 3:2022cv01731
Plaintiff:
His Sovereignty Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Gate Fourth Judicial Dist. Pros. Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Sicenbrud-Gate et al
as 3:2022cv01732
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Sicenbrud-Gate and PPB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Heavens-Gate et al
as 3:2022cv01727
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Heavens-Gate, Finders and Anzi Informants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Sicenbrood
as 3:2022cv01729
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Sicenbrood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Gate United States Government et al
as 3:2022cv01730
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Gate United States Government, We, Just Us and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Eckharts et al
as 3:2022cv01733
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Marie Beth Eckharts and Ashs Guptes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
