Cases 61 - 70 of 210
Joseph D. Addison, III v. California Institution for Men, et al
as 17-55732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH D. ADDISON III
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR MEN, JOHN MERCHANT, Captain, Facility Delta, in his individual and official capacity, MONA FORBES, Correctional Counselor I, Facility Delta, in her individual and official capacity and others
Gill v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00737
Petitioner:
Corey Eugene Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mendez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00555
Plaintiff:
Felipe Mendez, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America , Harjeet Ghotra, DDS , Adel Awad, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Houston v. Gill, et al
as 2:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Alamar Cyril Houston
Defendant:
Daniel Gill and K-9 Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley Gill Jr. v. California Attorney General
as 2:2017cv02105
Respondent:
California Attorney General
Petitioner:
Wiley Gill, Jr.
Gill v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00159
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, C. Brockway, Karen Gedney and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rohn Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garbarini v. Mendivil et al
as 1:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ralph Garbarini
Defendant:
D. Mendivil, Hernandez, Moniza Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaghe v. Lashway et al
as 3:2016cv05973
Plaintiff:
Sam Donaghe
Defendant:
Patrisha Lashway, Kevin Quigley, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urlacher v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05912
Plaintiff:
Charles RP Urlacher
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, Patrisha Lashway, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Roberts v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2016cv01929
Defendant:
D. Borders, D. Borders, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Roberts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
