Cases 61 - 70 of 3,155
McCormack v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Derek Steven McCormack
Defendant:
Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Alacanta et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mario Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Alacanta, Unknown Felix, Unknown Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Boulden et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Dyrell Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Boulden, Krosten, Layrana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larkin v. Cabraser et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Billy F. Larkin
Defendant:
Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Krsitopher S. Ritter, Stephen J. Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Campbell v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Campbell
Defendant:
Ruiz and Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McAlpin et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Judge McAlpin, Erik T Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Lanekia Monique Jones
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers #069618 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Edmund Powers
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Ryan Thornell, John Mattos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearring v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Frank Hearring
Defendant:
William Gittere, Tasheena Cooke, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
