Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Hollins v. Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02028
Plaintiff: Michael P. Hollins
Defendant: Starr Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Armstrong et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01929
Petitioner: Michael P. Hollins
Respondent: Sandra B Armstrong, Starr Wilson and Mark Goldrosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunsmore v. Law
as 9:2009cv00058
Petitioner: Michael P. Dunsmore
Respondent: Warden S. Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Price, et al
as 2:2009cv00128
Plaintiff: Ray Albert Lewis
Defendant: Steven Goff, Gerry Alexander, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunsmore v. Law
as 2:2009cv00473
Petitioner: Michael P. Dunsmore
Respondent: Warden S. Law
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keener v. Geiger Correction Center
as 2:2009cv00074
Plaintiff: Michael P Keener
Defendant: Geiger Correction Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Brown et al
as 2:2008cv02505
Plaintiff: Bernard Taylor
Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Dane R Gillette, Michael P Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael P Hollins v. S L Norwood et al
as 5:2008cv00649
Plaintiff: Michael P Hollins
Defendant: S L Norwood, Ali, Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hollins v. Norwood et al
as 3:2008cv02072
Plaintiff: Michael P. Hollins
Defendant: S. L. Norwood, Ali, Horton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anselmo v. Helling et al
as 3:2007cv00204
Plaintiff: Michael P. Anselmo
Defendant: Don Helling and Neveada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?