Cases 1 - 10 of 4,081
Hatchett v. Clark
as 4:2024cv03246
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunn v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
State of Nevada, University Medical Center, County of Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
Solomon Brooks and King Solomon Sekhemre El Neter
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Kevin McMahill, Andrea Kever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01390
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kramer v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Kramer
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oelker v. Idaho State Bar (ISB) et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
Jeromy Oelker
Respondent:
Idaho State Bar (ISB), Director Diane Minnich and Attorney Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Dustin Collins
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clem v. Clark
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Terrill Keith Clem
Defendant:
S. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
