Cases 1 - 10 of 165
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sidney V. Newton
Defendant:
Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Sidney Van Newton
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Dison v. Reaves et al
as 2:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Dison Jr. and Donald Ray Dison, Jr
Defendant:
R. Reaves, L. Para, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold Lee Newton v. Lynch
as 2:2023cv08715
Petitioner:
Arnold Lee Newton
Respondent:
Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branderhorst v. Newton et al
as 3:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Joshua Casey Branderhorst
Defendant:
Casey Newton and Clackamas County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lotusflower v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv05558
Plaintiff:
Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower
Defendant:
Charlotte Headley, Alishia McColl, Boschulte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fielding v. Chino Valley, City of et al
as 3:2022cv08238
Plaintiff:
Sherry Fielding
Defendant:
Chino Valley, City of, Jesse Newton, Sofia Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC)Hill v. Agonone et al
as 2:2022cv01845
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
J Agonone, A. Scotland, Officer N. Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sammy Newman et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv03467
Plaintiff:
Sammy Newton, Antonio Rincon and Sammy Newman
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva, Brendan Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Head v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08048
Petitioner:
Daniel Newton Head
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
