Cases 1 - 10 of 25
(PC) Saintillus v. USA et al
as 2:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
Chaloner Saintillus
Defendant:
United States of America, Phillip A. Talbert, Grant Rabenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01640
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John J. Cannell, M.D. v. Aurora Las Encinas Hospital
as 2:2019cv05042
Respondent:
Aurora Las Encinas Hospital
Petitioner:
John J. Cannell, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Perez v. Neven et al
as 2:2019cv00939
Defendant:
Patterson, Herrera, McCarter and others
Plaintiff:
Aurora Rodriguez-Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quigley v. City of Missoula et al
as 9:2019cv00035
Defendant:
City of Missoula and County of Missoula
Plaintiff:
Megan Aurora Quigley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Little v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER JAMES LITTLE, AKA Peter Little, Peter J. Little
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, BRIAN RADECKI, ACI Director, DEVON DICKINSON and others
Rodriguez-Perez v. Neven et al
as 2:2018cv00535
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Neven
Petitioner:
Aurora Rodriguez-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Little v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03794
Plaintiff:
Peter James Little
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Brian Radecki, Devon Dickinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anant Tripati v. Daryl Johnson, et al
as 17-15988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant - Appellee:
DARYL JOHNSON, Monitor Legal Access Services, ADOC, CHARLES L. RYAN, AURORA AGUILAR, Grievance Officer and others
Marin v. USA
as 3:2016cv02794
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aurora Marin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
