Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Bonilla v. McConnell et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Judith McConnell, Judge William S. Dato and Judge Jerry Bryon O'Rourke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadenas v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08332
Plaintiff:
Bryon E Cadenas and Byron E Cadenas
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ysasi v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08274
Plaintiff:
Bryon A Ysasi
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strock v. Gulick et al
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jacob Strock
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Dr. Bryon Hemphill, Lisa Koltes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryon Koeller v. Melissa Andrewjeski
as 23-35080
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYON CHARLES KOELLER
Respondent / Appellee:
MELISSA ANDREWJESKI
Parley Drew Hardman v. Bryon Birkholz
as 2:2022cv08713
Petitioner:
Parley Drew Hardman
Respondent:
Bryon Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parley Drew Hardman v. Bryon Birkholz
as 2:2022cv08723
Petitioner:
Parley Drew Hardman
Respondent:
Bryon Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parley Drew Hardman v. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv07787
Petitioner:
Parley Drew Hardman
Respondent:
Bryon Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pinsky v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Pinsky
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett Thomas v. Tucson Medical Center, et al
as 22-15679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARNETT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER, CODAC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, OFFICE OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE LICENSURE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
