Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Chapman v. Barron et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Roslyn Demetriu Chapman
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and LoAnne Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Aguilar v. Hallings et al
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Tito Barron Aguilar
Defendant:
C/O Hallings, C/O Sergent William Tate, C/O Senior Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Roughton et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Hopkins
Defendant:
Lt. Roughton, Warden Barron, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolford v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01689
Petitioner:
Audrey Jean Wolford
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hazen v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01636
Petitioner:
Jamez C Hazen
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tapia v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Petitioner:
Jasmin Jetta Tapia
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lei v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Wobiao Lei
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Zdenek Davis
Defendant:
Barron, Weaver, Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parviz v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Petitioner:
Mahsa Parviz
Respondent:
H Barron and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Escobar v. Irby et al
as 2:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Michael D Escobar
Defendant:
Irene Barron Irby, Unknown Navarro, Unknown Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
