Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A.
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Cress Carney
Respondent:
State of Alaska D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A.
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Cress Carney
Respondent:
State of Alaska D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Frei v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision et al
as 6:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Scott Frei and Richard W. Salmon
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Michael Wu, Christine Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Oregon Board of Parole Members et al
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Diane Downs
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole Members, Michael Washington, Diane Rea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halladay v. Hsu et al
as 6:2020cv02015
Defendant:
John Bailey, Patty Cress, Michael Hsu and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey David Halladay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carney v. Lapinskas et al
as 3:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Lapinskas, Ms. Gillmore, Sgt. Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
Cress Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carney v. Cox et al
as 3:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Cress Carney
Defendant:
John Cox and William Lapinskas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cress v. Snohomish County Superior Court et al
as 2:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Ted L Cress
Defendant:
Snohomish County Superior Court, Snohomish County Public Defender Association, Snohomish County Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv00218
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Patty Cress, Leslie Farerra and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cress v. USA
as 3:2013cv01234
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Cress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
