Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Defendant:
Chief Adams, Sgt. Callaway, Lt. Clasal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bosarge v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Milton Wayne Bosarge
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Council, Ed Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Timothy Crawford
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, O.D.O.C., Sgt. Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leslie v. John Does 1-10 et al
as 2:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Leslie
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Eckstrom, et al.
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Deputy J. Eckstrom and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avalos v. Baltzell et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
Jeneva Cotton, Schneider, Brian Schuetter and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. McMillian et al
as 2:2017cv01393
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-6, John and Jane Does 7-12, Killem and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hermanns-Raymond v. Hawaii, State of et al
as 1:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Rocky Hermanns-Raymond
Defendant:
Hawaii, State of, John Doe 1-6 and Jane Doe 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. King County Sheriff et al
as 2:2011cv00982
Plaintiff:
Shawn Casey
Defendant:
King County Sheriff, Sue Rahr and John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Figueroga et al
as 2:2010cv01966
Plaintiff:
Thomas Denton
Defendant:
Fred Figueroga, James Yates, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
