Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Harrell v. Martinez et al
as 3:2024cv03213
Plaintiff:
Eshawn M. Harrell
Defendant:
Officer Martinez and Officer Montenegra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Loukedis
as 3:2023cv05335
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Maurice Harrell
Defendant:
Savas Loukedis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv05337
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Maurice Harrell
Defendant:
Ryan Martin, San Mateo County Probation Department, Ema Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell et al v. Wagstaffe et al
as 3:2023cv05120
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Maurice Harrell and Adrian Dewitt Marcel Watson
Defendant:
Stephen M. Wagstaffe, F. Cardenas and Jenna L. Barton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. San Jose Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv04839
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Maurice Harrell
Defendant:
San Jose Police Department, Javier Rodriguez and Valley Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Rapp et al
as 1:2023cv03029
Plaintiff:
Shane Robert Harrell
Defendant:
Lisa Rapp, H Morse, J McCrory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derek Harrell v. Kathleen Allison
as 22-55510
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEREK D. HARRELL
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Harrell v. Lopez
as 2:2021cv01227
Petitioner:
Joshua Neil Harrell
Respondent:
Frank Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC)Harrell v. Stanton Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2021cv00602
Plaintiff:
David Allen Harrell and Harell
Defendant:
Helm, Solano County Sheriff's Office, Fairfield Justice Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
