Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Bateman v. Hawk et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bateman
Defendant:
Jason Hawk, Robert Melvin, City of Newcastle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Mueller et al
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Dakota John-Hawk Romero
Defendant:
Mueller, Polliak, Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimsley v. Nike Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Inc., Nicole Brown, Tim Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
(HC) Blundell v. FCI Mendota Warden
as 1:2022cv01590
Petitioner:
Jese Hawk Blundell, Sr.
Respondent:
FCI Mendota Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Richard Hawks v. Todd Billeci
as 22-16296
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD HAWKS
Respondent / Appellee:
TODD BILLECI, County Probation Officer, Contra Costa County
Not Classified By Court:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
James Sams v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-15643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PLAS SAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, CHELSEA ARMENTA, Office Services Supervisor I, W. HAWKINGS, Correctional Captain and others
Hawk v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 2:2020cv02263
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Robert Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
