Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv07027
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. District Judge Otis D Wright, II, U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, Otis D. Wright II, Stephen V. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PS) Doe v. Nunemaker et al
as 4:2022cv02963
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Joe Nunemaker, Dustin Greene, Darryl J. Holcombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Keyes v. D. Samuels et al
as 2:2022cv03422
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keyes
Defendant:
D. Samuels, N. Gaughan, M. Ayon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Holcomb
as 2:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Rashied Maceo Mitchell
Respondent:
Don Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holcomb v. Grassley et al
as 3:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Duard Holcomb
Defendant:
Dr. Grassley, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Bowser
as 2:2018cv02066
Respondent:
Troy Bowser
Petitioner:
Marc Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holcomb #091014 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00379
Petitioner:
Kent Return Holcomb
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emery v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv01227
Defendant:
Nurse Ann, T. Bailey, T. Byerly and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
