Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Inman v. Reyes
as 2:2021cv01500
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Inman
Respondent:
E. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Inman et al v. Tucker et al
as 4:2020cv04019
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Inman, David A. Redwine and Gary Cross
Defendant:
K. Hoffman, W. Tucker and R. Briggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Inman v. Koenig
as 2:2019cv02122
Petitioner:
Ronald Jerrell Inman
Defendant:
C. Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Inman v. Koenig
as 1:2019cv01543
Respondent:
C. Koenig
Petitioner:
Ronald Jerrell Inman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Inman v. Bechtold et al
as 3:2018cv02062
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerrell Inman
Defendant:
Steven J. Bechtold and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. J. Bendel, et al
as 17-17524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BENDEL, Correctional Officer IV - Badge No. 2491 at Eyman Complex - SMU II, INMAN, Correctional Officer III at Eyman Complex - SMU II, S. ANDERSON, Correctional Officer IV at Florence Complex - CB6 and others
Inman v. Hatton et al
as 3:2017cv06612
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerrell Inman
Defendant:
S. Hatton, Y Martinez, S Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. Inman, et al
as 17-16965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
INMAN, Correctional Officer III at Eyman Complex - SMU II, TARA DIAZ, R.O.D./ Committee Chairperson for STG Validation on 10/22/14 at Unknown Location, JEFF RODE, Associated Deputy Warden/ Committee Member for STG Validation on 10/22/14 at Unknown Location and others
Inman v. Spearman et al
as 3:2015cv01767
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerrell Inman
Defendant:
M. E. Spearman and Steven J. Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #151089 v. McWilliams et al
as 2:2015cv00670
Defendant:
J Bendel, Unknown Inman, S Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
